I read “It’s a Girl!” in the Apocalypse and I found two hot spots. The first host spot I found is located on page 363. It reads “Many Chinese couples opt for an abortion of a female fetus if they lose the natural- reproduction lottery by not conceiving a boy notes ethicist R. Alta Charo of the University of Wisconsin-Madison.” I chose this as a hot spot because I was appalled when I read this sentence. I know that in China, a while ago, if a couple conceived a girl, they became very upset and would somehow try to get rid of their child. Couples sometimes were so dead set on having a baby boy that they would sometimes steal other peoples’ children in order to have a son. They would kidnap him when he was young and raise them as their own. I was not aware that this kind of thing was still going on in China. I thought that it was old news. After reading this essay, I assume that the Chinese still favor having a boy over a girl. I do not understand this tradition. It seems cruel to me. A child is a child. Just because it is a girl should not make a difference. If you are unable to conceive a baby with the sex that you prefer, does not mean you should abort the pregnancy. I believe this for no matter what sex it is, whether it is a boy or a girl.
The second hot spot that I found in “It’s a Girl!” is located on page 364. It reads “Sex ratios and sexism aside, some ethicists worry about a culture where parents are driven to pick out and of the traits of their unborn children.” I chose this as one of my hot spots because whenever I hear about this type of thing, I wonder about people wanting to create the “perfect baby.” If or when doctors discover a way to genetically alter the genes of a human being, I believe that it could be beneficial, but also dangerous. It would be life-changing if there was a way to be sure that your child was going to be a healthy baby, and not have any fetal diseases or deformities. I believe that if a couple decided to use the doctors for this reason, it would be acceptable. But once they go a little bit further and chose to decide what hair color the baby has, I think they have gone too far. A baby should be a creation of the mother and fathers genes, it should be natural.
I read “Why We Should Go To Mars,” and I found two hot spots. My first hot spot is located on page 390. It reads “It appears now that life can exist anywhere there is water and some minerals.” The author says this in order to make us believe that it is possible that life could exist on Mars. I did not know that this was the case. I believe it, but I think that the author is just trying to convince us to go to Mars. I am confused as to why this would even be in the Apocalypse book. It is not like it is even written that well. It does not make much sense; it is just talking about why we should go to Mars. I am sure that many people believe that we should go, but I do not understand why this essay made it into the book.
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Alayna 5B
After reading “It's A Girl!” by Kathleen Fackelmann, I had two hotspots. The first one was on page 361. It says “Some parents-to-be hope for a girl. Some wish for a boy. The outcome, however, has always been pretty much a matter of chance.” This is the first thing it says one the first page, and it wasn't my hotspot until I read the section and knew what it was about. This is my hotspot because I think this is the way it should be and stay. I think that it's ridiculous that there are couples out there who can't have a child and would do anything to have one, and at the same time, there are people out there who can have children so easily that they've gotten to the point that they want to pick what they will give birth to. I think it's sad. I also think it's sad because, although I don't have a child myself, one of my best friends does and one of the most exciting parts about her nine months being pregnant, was the day she figured out if it was a boy or a girl. I don't think people should give that up. There are a few special times when you're having a baby that make the nine months special and maybe go by quicker and I would imagine that that day is one of them.
My second hotspot was on page 364. It says “Rothman, for example, worries about parents who choose a sex because they are seeking to fulfill stereotypical, perhaps unrealistic roles.” This was my second hotspot because I agree with Rothman. I think that the only reason a family would pick the gender of their child is because they are being stereotypical. I think couples choose the gender because there are certain things they want to do with their son or daughter, and to their surprise, it may not always turn out like that. Like the book says, you might pick a girl because you want to pick out prom dresses and take her to get her nails done. What if she doesn't like dresses? What if she'd rather play in dirt every day and wear old jeans? I don't think you should pick a gender based on what you want to do, I think you should be lucky you can even have a child and take your child for what it is and who they are.
While reading “Why We Should Go To Mars” by Kim Stanley Robinson, I came across two hotspots. The first one was on page 390. This was where it said that “one of the most powerful scientific methods for understanding something is to compare it with other things like it, and there aren't many options when you look around for other planets to compare with Earth.” This was one of my hotspots because before reading this, I hadn't put much thought into going to Mars and I was kind of leaning towards no.. not for any good reason. After reading this, it kind of sold me. I think this is a great reason to go to Mars and I like the way it was said. I think I agree because I can relate. In science classes, you compare things to one another to help you get a better understanding and this would just be one really big science experiment. This would help us learn more about Earth and look into new life elsewhere. It's kind of a win-win situation.
My second hotspot was on page 390. It says “Some will say we can send robots to make these investigations.” I think this is a bad idea. Maybe not bad, but surely not thorough. Robots can do a lot, but I don't think we'll be able to dig as deep as we'd like at Mars. I also think it would be more of an experience for the astronauts who get to go up and come back with a story. Robots are great for technical things, but I feel as though it would be more of an accomplishment for the U.S to send people there and walk like they did on the moon, we take pride in that and we could take pride in this. I just think there could be so much more we could gather with a human body up there. At the same time though, I wonder if it would be more expensive for a robot or human? And if we only send two robots compared to six humans, how much would that cost? That's basically the only reason I have doubts about going to Mars, because of the price. I feel like our economy is in such a hell hole right now, that we would have to wait awhile and choose the cheapest route when doing so.
My second hotspot was on page 364. It says “Rothman, for example, worries about parents who choose a sex because they are seeking to fulfill stereotypical, perhaps unrealistic roles.” This was my second hotspot because I agree with Rothman. I think that the only reason a family would pick the gender of their child is because they are being stereotypical. I think couples choose the gender because there are certain things they want to do with their son or daughter, and to their surprise, it may not always turn out like that. Like the book says, you might pick a girl because you want to pick out prom dresses and take her to get her nails done. What if she doesn't like dresses? What if she'd rather play in dirt every day and wear old jeans? I don't think you should pick a gender based on what you want to do, I think you should be lucky you can even have a child and take your child for what it is and who they are.
While reading “Why We Should Go To Mars” by Kim Stanley Robinson, I came across two hotspots. The first one was on page 390. This was where it said that “one of the most powerful scientific methods for understanding something is to compare it with other things like it, and there aren't many options when you look around for other planets to compare with Earth.” This was one of my hotspots because before reading this, I hadn't put much thought into going to Mars and I was kind of leaning towards no.. not for any good reason. After reading this, it kind of sold me. I think this is a great reason to go to Mars and I like the way it was said. I think I agree because I can relate. In science classes, you compare things to one another to help you get a better understanding and this would just be one really big science experiment. This would help us learn more about Earth and look into new life elsewhere. It's kind of a win-win situation.
My second hotspot was on page 390. It says “Some will say we can send robots to make these investigations.” I think this is a bad idea. Maybe not bad, but surely not thorough. Robots can do a lot, but I don't think we'll be able to dig as deep as we'd like at Mars. I also think it would be more of an experience for the astronauts who get to go up and come back with a story. Robots are great for technical things, but I feel as though it would be more of an accomplishment for the U.S to send people there and walk like they did on the moon, we take pride in that and we could take pride in this. I just think there could be so much more we could gather with a human body up there. At the same time though, I wonder if it would be more expensive for a robot or human? And if we only send two robots compared to six humans, how much would that cost? That's basically the only reason I have doubts about going to Mars, because of the price. I feel like our economy is in such a hell hole right now, that we would have to wait awhile and choose the cheapest route when doing so.
Writing Log 5B Ellis Battista
Ellis Battista
Ms. Graysmith
English 151 Writing Log 5B
27 April 2011
The first story I read was called “It’s A Girl” by Kathleen Fackelmann. The story mainly talks about having scientist help you get the desired gender of the baby that you want. Although it is not completely accurate yet, they have a pretty good rate at which the correct gender is born. The one problem is that they can only do this process accurately with on gender, they still cannot do it for males. The scientist seemed like they were doing a good job, but the author asked the question when will it be too far? There are already a lot of people who do not agree with this in the United States. The first hot spot I found was on page 364 and it said “Murray notes that scientists working on the human genome project soon will have methods of identifying disease-causing genes as well as the DNA that produces characteristics such as hair color, height, athletic ability, and perhaps some behaviors.” The reason why this is one of my hot spots is because this is a very controversial topic. I have pretty strong feelings about changing babies scientifically. On terms of gender, I feel like parents can be leaning toward one gender, but should never chose a gender just because they want one. The only reason I can see acceptable for a couple to predetermine their baby’s gender is if one of the parents have a disease or sickness that is most likely to pass down to a certain gender. I think that if an adult has a disease like that, they should be able to have scientists try to give them a baby that is the opposite gender of the one that would get the disease. I do not like the idea of scientists genetically altering sperm and egg in order to change physical features about the baby at all. Once again, if there is some sort of disease that could be prevented from this, then I think it would be okay, but other than that I feel like it is cheating. To me, altering a kid’s physical features is like an athlete taking steroids, it is cheating. Another thing I think about is that they have not even discovered how to do this yet, and have no idea if it is safe at all.
My second hot spot is on page 365 and says “Although lawmakers may never regulate sex-selection methods, Murray contends that genetic counselors should begin developing guidelines to steer couples away from the designer-baby concept. The reason why I like this is because I agree with it. I feel like some parents are hard on their kids, and when their kids do not have the athletic talent or intelligence, the parents are much more critical of them, and in some cases do not love them as much. What happens when a parents wants his or her kid to be better than they were, and they have scientists genetically alter the baby, and the kid is not what the parent thought it would be? In some cases, not all, I think that the parents would have potential to be so disappointed and even angry at the kid, and possibly not love the kid as much because of it. Another reason why I liked this is because abortion is a huge extremely controversial topic, and I feel like when the technology comes out to change traits of babies, it will be the same.
The second story I read was called “Why Should We Go to Mars” by Kim Stanley Robinson. The story was short, and mainly about going to Mars because it will benefit our understanding about our world. The first hot spot I found was on page 390, and it says “we should go to Mars to search for life there.” I know it is kind of stupid but I have always been interested in aliens and life outside of Earth. I know that we will not find any life that is extremely developed or look like humans or anything, but I think that finding a life form, even if it is just something like small bacteria is excited. It is exciting because that proves that Mars is livable for at least some life. That makes me think that sometime in the future there really could be intelligent life on mars, but that is most likely just my imagination. My second hot spot is on the same page, and it says “the search for life would be difficult to do mechanically, and the truth is that humans are much better at field geology than robots.” The author is talking about sending humans instead of robots to mars. This would be good from a scientific standpoint because like the author said, they would get better research. Another reason it would be good is because humans could really explore the planet, instead of just getting pictures and small samples. Humans could recall of what happened while they were there and could give a lot more details. Another reason why I think it would be better for humans to go is because humans have never landed on Mars before. It would be a big accomplishment for us to successfully travel to Mars, and find life there for ourselves.
I feel like technological advancement is the best thing for us, and also the worst. It really depends on what kind of technology you are talking about and there are many shades of gray. Technology like facebook is one of those things that are very good and also very bad for us at the same time. Facebook is a great way for people to stay close with family and friends over long distances and is helpful in making new friends in new places. On the other hand it is bad because some people do all of their socializing on facebook, instead of being out in the real world doing it. Many people now are addicted to facebook, and they spend hours and hours a day wasting their life with virtual friendships. Life without facebook is not hard to imagine because just a few years ago I did not have one, the biggest thing for me was going from not having a cell phone to having a cell phone. To be honest, I love having my cell phone, but I really miss the days when I did not have it. I do not remember the last time I used a landline. I miss calling my friends on the phone and seeing what they wanted to do that day. I also miss hanging out with my friends and actually hanging out, instead of texting other people half the time. To me texting got way too popular, but I cannot argue because I text nearly all day every day. I do not think I can imagine what the world will be like in thirty years. I do not think anyone could. There are always so many technological advancements all the time that we have no idea what there will be. If you think about it, thirty years ago if you told people we would have little boxes the size of your palm that could get you any information on a completely virtual database they would call you crazy. Looking at it from that point I do not think that we can even guess what there will be in thirty years.
Writing Log 5B
It’s A Girl:
My first hotspot was “Sex ratios and sexism aside some ethicists worry about a culture where parents are driven to pick out any of the traits of their unborn children” This sentence really made me think about how offended I would feel if I found out my parents attempted to make me the way I am today. Not only would it make parents in this day and age look shallow, it would make people think that parents wouldn’t love their child if there was something that they didn’t plan.
The second hotspot I chose was when they were talking about the experiment that had been done. Out of 119 women, 29 got pregnant using the sorted sperm. Out of those 29 women, 8 ended up with a miscarriage or surgery. It is impressive that they can pick the sex of their babies but there are also many complications that follow this
Why We Should Go To Mars:
The first hotspot I found while reading Why We Should Go to Mars is “The notion that we should take on such a dangerous and expensive endeavor just so an elite remnant of Earthlings might survive if we destroy ourselves here on our our plant, for instance, is ludicrous.” I definitely agree with this. I feel that they should continue doing research from our planet until they know every possible outcome.
The second hotspot I picked out of this selection was when they were talking about sending robots to make the investigations. They say that it would be almost impossible to find out if there is life on mars by using a robot.
My first hotspot was “Sex ratios and sexism aside some ethicists worry about a culture where parents are driven to pick out any of the traits of their unborn children” This sentence really made me think about how offended I would feel if I found out my parents attempted to make me the way I am today. Not only would it make parents in this day and age look shallow, it would make people think that parents wouldn’t love their child if there was something that they didn’t plan.
The second hotspot I chose was when they were talking about the experiment that had been done. Out of 119 women, 29 got pregnant using the sorted sperm. Out of those 29 women, 8 ended up with a miscarriage or surgery. It is impressive that they can pick the sex of their babies but there are also many complications that follow this
The first hotspot I found while reading Why We Should Go to Mars is “The notion that we should take on such a dangerous and expensive endeavor just so an elite remnant of Earthlings might survive if we destroy ourselves here on our our plant, for instance, is ludicrous.” I definitely agree with this. I feel that they should continue doing research from our planet until they know every possible outcome.
The second hotspot I picked out of this selection was when they were talking about sending robots to make the investigations. They say that it would be almost impossible to find out if there is life on mars by using a robot.
Log 5B hotspots
The first hotspot in “It's a Girl” for me came when the author actually described the process they use to stack the odds of the baby's gender. The whole process seemed so unnatural, and I feel that doing such a thing is a crime against nature. I believe that couples should just let nature take its course, and their love for their child shouldn't be determined by the gender of the child. I don't really believe the technology will take in the United States though, the reason being that we have more equal rights here.
The second hotspot for me was when the described all the details that they could potentially manipulate with the child. They admit that there is no way that they can manipulate a baby other than it's gender for the time being, but what if they do develop the technology that allow these scientists to change the baby's IQ, looks, or even interests. I see this as the parents being selfish, as they are not allowing the child the chance to even be who he or she wants to be. I cant really seeing this becoming too popular in America, but in countries like China where having a male child is important to carry the name, I can see this technology being popular. This would have negative consequences though, as the increase of males over females would lead to a drastic population decline. I may not agree with this technology, but I still believe that people have the right to use it. People should be allowed to make their own decisions, and if they want to choose the gender of their child, then they should be allowed to do so.
The first hotspot for me in “Why We Should Go to Mars” was when the author claimed that going to Mars would help us better understand Earth. At first I found this difficult to comprehend, but as the author explained I learned that going to Mars would help a great deal. I've always been interested in space exploration, and when I was younger I always dreamed of being an astronaut. The idea that there could have been life on Mars really interests me, and to think that we could actually land people there to study the planet is mind-blowing. While it is safer to send robots to the planet, the cost of sending all these robots adds up, and there are also some things that a human just needs to be there to do.
The second aspect that blew my mind was the price. The fact that the price has dropped by 400 billion dollars over the past decade is amazing, and actually putting a man on Mars is finally within our grasp. 50 billion dollars is still quite a lot of money though, and NASA doesn't receive as wide of a budget as it used to. Actually landing on another planet would be the greatest achievement in human history, and would probably mark the first step into what we currently perceive as the future. This achievement would make us think about our accomplishments and set our sights higher for the future. The idea of actually colonizing Mars would seem a lot closer once we actually place people on it, and who knows where we would go from there.
5b hot spots
“ It’s a girl” by Kathleen Facklemann is a story about genetically determining the sex of your child. With technology you can decide whether you want a boy or girl. The first hot spot I found is on page 363. “ There’s a lot that’s not known.” I chose this hot spot because it proves my point that I do not think determining the sex of your child is okay. Not only do I think it is immoral I think it is very dangerous. Who knows what the side effects can be, even though the baby’s are being born safe now what if something goes wrong in the future. I understand you need trial and error with every new invention but this has to do with human beings lives. I do not think we should be willing to put their health on the line just to make sure they are a certain sex. I think a parent should be happy either way if it is a boy or a girl its still their child ! The second hot spot i picked was on page 361. “ Nonetheless, the new technology raises some concern about the future.” I chose this as my second hot spot because it also proves my point on why I disagree with this new technology. It includes risks that we should not be willing to take. What would a world be like if girls completely outnumbered boys or vice versa. It would be absolute craziness. The gender would continuously have to make children from technology and the family aspect may not even be a concern anymore. I think since there is has not been a future for these children who are created we will be experiencing many risks and factors were not prepared for.
“ Similarly, to claim that such an undertaking is worthwhile because it will solve all of humanities problems is taking things too far” (389). This is the first hot spot I found in “ Why we should go to mars” Written by Kim Stanley Robinson. In this story we are should good, bad and really bad reasons for going to mars. I think this hot spot shows what I feel the most. In stead of looking for a new planet to live on for once we destroy ours how about we find a way to fix ares! If people just looked at the simple actions to fixing problems life would be so much easier but they don’t. They look for things like mars, total backup plans that are completely ridiculous. There is no way all our problems would go away just from going to mars. If we went we would repeat all our mistakes because people don’t change. The second hot spot I chose is on page 390. “Some will say we can send robots to make these investigations.” I just thought this was kinda cool and kinda funny. I Know that someday most likely in the near future this will be happening and to be honest it would not even really shock me. I think that if we need to send a robot into mars just to find out whats up there it should be obvious that its going to be impossible to have everyone else go there. I think going to mars is a far fetched dream. I think this is cool because if they actually got a robot that was that well programed and could go to mars and discover whats up there that would be sweet. I wonder if some day this will actually happen .
“ Similarly, to claim that such an undertaking is worthwhile because it will solve all of humanities problems is taking things too far” (389). This is the first hot spot I found in “ Why we should go to mars” Written by Kim Stanley Robinson. In this story we are should good, bad and really bad reasons for going to mars. I think this hot spot shows what I feel the most. In stead of looking for a new planet to live on for once we destroy ours how about we find a way to fix ares! If people just looked at the simple actions to fixing problems life would be so much easier but they don’t. They look for things like mars, total backup plans that are completely ridiculous. There is no way all our problems would go away just from going to mars. If we went we would repeat all our mistakes because people don’t change. The second hot spot I chose is on page 390. “Some will say we can send robots to make these investigations.” I just thought this was kinda cool and kinda funny. I Know that someday most likely in the near future this will be happening and to be honest it would not even really shock me. I think that if we need to send a robot into mars just to find out whats up there it should be obvious that its going to be impossible to have everyone else go there. I think going to mars is a far fetched dream. I think this is cool because if they actually got a robot that was that well programed and could go to mars and discover whats up there that would be sweet. I wonder if some day this will actually happen .
Writing Log 5B
The first essay that I read was “It’s a Girl!” by Kathleen Fackelmann. The first hotspot that I found in this essay was, “Out of the 119 women, 29 got pregnant using the sorted sperm. In 8 women, the pregnancy ended in miscarriage or surgery, the latter because of a dangerous condition,” (363). This it talking about the results of the people that participated in the study that allowed them to chose the sex of their baby. The paragraph goes on to say that only 14 of the pregnancies, that the gender had been determined, all but one were girls as they had wanted. I chose this hotspot because I found it very interesting, and it made me stop and think. First off I must say that I disagree with someone being able to choose what gender their baby is. To me you get what you get and you should be happy because you should be grateful you had a baby. Also I don’t understand why someone would pay thousands of dollars to pick the gender of their baby with only a 24% chance that you will even get pregnant, and in this study on 21 of the women actually had there babies based on what we are told. I just think that a world were you can chose if you have a boy or girl will more than likely cause future problems. First off there will right off the bat be the religion side of things, and I can guess without even asking know that there are religions that will if not have already said that it is morally wrong. Another point that they brought up was that some wanted to chose the gender because of genetic disorder or diseases. This immediately brought to mind the genetic disorder that only affect males, Muscular Dystrophy. The only thing is when having a female child the mother is passing the gene on to daughter so in reality they are not avoiding anything but just continuing it on to the next generation.
My second hotspot was, “Many Chinese couples opt for an abortion of a female fetus if they lose the natural-reproduction lottery by not conceiving a boy…” (363). This is paragraph was talking about how in China they have a male dominate population and they do this by just aborting the female babies. So in away China is doing the gender selection in a way worse way. To me this quote gave a different view on the gender selection study, while it is probably something I would never support it is way better than abortion. But if you look at it another way years ago in China there was a limit on how many children a family could have, so if every family was only allowed to have one child and they all wanted boys there the natural selection process will be out of sorts and we can then begin having regions of the world with mostly one gender of the other. I also find it sad that in this quote they are using such a terrible thing to make the gender selecting study seem like its okay.
The second essay I read was “Why We Should Go to Mars” by Kim Stanley Robinson. The first hotspot I found was “The better we understand out planet, the better we will be able to keep it (and ourselves) healthy,” (390). Later on in the paragraph it says, “Comparative planetology is an environmentalist tool, and going to the Red Planet is a green project,” (390). This is saying that study Mars which is very similar to Earth from how it began to how it is now can help us keep our planet it better condition for us. First off I found this very intriguing because we have all heard all the crazy arguments about why we should go to Mars but this was a new one to me. Also I think that this is a really good idea, as long as we don’t do things to Mars that may possibly harm the planet, and make it so that is can keep changing and evolving. I find it funny that they said it would be “a green project” because it is like they know that throwing that in will change a lot of people opinions about it, by using a couple words that some people try to live by.
My second hotspot was “We live for our stories, and it would be inspiring to see our civilization make a peaceful international effort to explore another world, seeking knowledge rather than profits,” (390-391). This was used as a final point on why we should go to Mars. I feel that it was a good way to end the essay and even had a good point. We all love to tell and hear stories the great stories that helped shaped things we know. We also all have heard the stories about America and Russia’s battle over who could get to space first. But I agree it would be beneficial for an international effort. I help the whole world to get things figured out but we all know that it will be hard to do something that big peacefully because everyone thinks they are better than the other.
The world today in just 5 years alone has made some huge technological advances. I think some are good like cell phones and such but only to a point. For kids today a world with out Internet is probably something that is impossible to imagine, but is it all it is cracked up to be. I think that now days we rely too much on technology. For example under the new healthcare reform all medical records are going to be done electronically and doctors and nurses will always be carry laptops around. While in my opinion it will make things easier, people who aren’t familiar with it are having problems with the idea of this. When I worked in a nursing home all patients information was kept in a database, now we didn’t carry laptops instead there was a little touch screen on the wall to put all the info in. I must say not only did it save space in the nurses stations it also made it easier to get more things done. You could take care of a resident go punch the info in and go to the next instead of paper work. I think that technology in that sense it good and useful but when people abuse it is when it becomes a problem.
Writing Log 5B
It’s a Girl
When reading this essay, it made me think of the movie, Baby Momma. I never thought it was going to be possible to pick out the traits for your unborn baby. I thought that being able to implant sperm into a woman’s body, to make a baby was enough technological advances to pregnancy. The first hotspot that stuck out to me was, “The outcome, however, has always been pretty much a matter of chance” (pg.361). This is how our parents made us, and how their parents made them. When someone is pregnant and going to have a baby, this is how the outcome of pregnancy should be. Some people however, do not like being surprised with the birth of their baby; they would rather be told the sex of the unborn child. When reading this essay, my second hotspot was, “Using a mechanical sperm sorter, the Fairfax team reported that nearly 93 percent of the babies born were of the desired sex” (pg.361). This new technological advance to pregnancy could change the world. If people desire to have only girl babies, I feel as though our country would be strictly female, with few men. Being able to pick the sex of your unborn baby is one thing, but being able to pick if they will be athletic or not is somewhat crazy. The essay stated that there will soon be, “...DNA that produces characteristics such as hair color, height, athletic ability, and perhaps some behaviors” (pg.364). Parents are going to want to produce the perfect baby, with all of these new advances. If a parent were to pick out all of these traits that they wanted for their baby, and then when the baby was born and didn’t have any of those traits, they would be upset and disappointed. I feel as though being pregnant should mean what it used to mean.
Why We Should Go to Mars
When first seeing the title of this essay, I felt as though I wouldn’t be interested in what was being said, however I was wrong. Reading this essay, I came across my first hotspot, “The better we understand our planet, the better we will be able to keep it (and ourselves) healthy” (pg.309). I agree with this statement because there have been studies that show similarities with mars and earth. When trying to compare our planet with others, to better understand it, there aren’t many planets we can do this with. Mars is one of the few planets that isn’t harmful for us to land on and study. The second hotspot I came across was, “If we go there and find life, or even fossil evidence of past life, it would be one of the most important scientific discoveries in history” (pg.390). This is one of the better reasons why we should go to mars and explore what is on the planet. I say this because when I grew up, my parents told me tons of stories about what it was like when they were growing up. If people were to go to mars in this lifetime, thin of all the wonderful stories people could tell. Depending on what is found on mars, could potentially make our world a better place.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)